marines
Wwii Usmc
Do you consider George Bush to be a good Commander In Chief?
I served in the Army honorably from ’84 to ’87. I never thought of my service as just a “job” or getting a paycheck. I was extremely patriotic. Reagan was president and I remember when we bombed Kadafi in Libya. I was never afraid to go to war because I knew Reagan was willing to use high-tech bombs to defeat the enemy. Bush, on the other hand, seems to be content with throwing human bodies in front of bullets. With the most high-tech weapons on Earth, I don’t feel that he is a ground-level foot sodiers commander in chief. Instead, he is a do-nothing executive type. Where is Ike when we need him? If Bush were president during WWII we would be speaking German now. And why isn’t he defending the USMC soldiers who are being charged with firing too many bullets at the enemy? He should stand up and be a true Commander In Chief!!!!!
That is one area I give both Bush’s very high marks for. They both let Generals run wars and don’t micromanage from the White House. The worst was definitely LBJ by those standards. Liberals don’t trust the military and thus micromanage. That is why conservatives tend to make better Commanders in Chief.
HARLEY STREET GLIDE IN USMC WWII DRESS